To ensure a solid critique is submitted, follow these guidelines:
Your review should be be two pages in length, double spaced, and include proper current APA citations and references (with the references listed on a second page).
Document is grammatically sound, and free from spelling errors.
A good critique involves an organized paper that demonstrates a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.
The first paragraph summarizes the research and the conclusions.
One or two paragraphs that analyze and evaluate the conclusions based upon what you have learned about ergonomics in this module and about human factors in the preceding modules. The summary is on topic and provides a well-written compilation of important points form the article, and are presented coherently with supporting details.
A final paragraph or two that draw conclusions regarding the relative validity of the research in regard to its ability to contribute a positive impact on human performance and to reduce human error based on a creative application of that analysis and evaluation. The writing indicates effectiveness in reflective thinking and the description of how information relates to other ideas, courses, educational and professional experiences.
Analyze and evaluate one major drawback to air traffic control automation. Then discuss the degradation in operational safety that could result from this drawback. Finally, creatively apply the knowledge of improving liveware and hardware that you developed in Modules 6 and 7 to that analysis, and develop a proposed means for mitigating this drawback. As always, support your work with a reliable source (s).
Latest completed orders:
|#||Title||Academic Level||Subject Area||# of Pages||Paper Urgency|